#africanews #drcongo A few days ago, the world held its breath as the President of the United States, Donald Trump, stepped up to a podium and made a stunning announcement. He declared, with absolute certainty, that he had ended decades of bloodshed in the Congo. His words rang out across the world: “Today, the violence and destruction come to an end, and the entire region begins a new chapter of hope and opportunity.” It sounded like a miracle.
Trump made this bold claim just moments after delegates from Rwanda and Congo signed a peace deal — one he’s proudly calling the “Washington Deal.” But behind the smiles and handshakes, shadows linger. Because there’s one question we all need to ask: Has the fighting in Congo truly ended?
And there’s another, even more puzzling question. Why was Rwanda at the negotiating table — but not the countless armed groups that have torn Congo apart for years? And finally, the question that always lurks in the dark corners of diplomacy: Who really benefits from this so-called peace deal? Congo? Rwanda? Or the United States?
Today, we’re going to dig deeper. We’re peeling back the layers of politics, power, and hidden interests. Because in the Congo, nothing is ever as simple as it seems. Let’s begin.
For decades, the Democratic Republic of Congo has been trapped in a brutal crisis that has left millions dead. The numbers are staggering. Reports say Congo alone has more than a hundred different armed groups tearing the country apart, village by village, life by life.
But just a few days ago, something unexpected happened. Around a polished wooden table, delegates from Congo and Rwanda signed a treaty — with the eyes of the world upon them — and in the presence of U.S. President Donald Trump. According to reports, the deal promises that both nations will respect each other’s territorial borders and end hostilities. And woven into the agreement is something else: an open door for greater American investment in Congo’s critical minerals.
Музыка
Фильмы
ТВ Шоу
Категории видео
