Erin Spicer & Mark Goldszmidt: The good, bad & ugly of improvement science publications #Quality2024

Подробнее о видео

Erin Spicer and Mark Goldszmidt from the London Health Sciences Center in Canada speak to Natalie Creary about the common errors made when writing improvement science work for scientific publication.

This topic is essential for the Quality Forum because even experienced improvement science researchers, at times, struggle to publish their work. In part, the problem is that the field is relatively young, and the community is still working through the best approach for representing the work in the form of scholarly publications. During this session, we will describe the results of our scoping review study on effective (and less effective) writing styles for improvement science. We will also describe findings related to common pitfalls and strengths in project design and execution. Participants at all levels of experience will not want to miss this high-yield session.

Mark Goldszmidt, MDCM, MHPE, PhD is a clinician Leader and Research Scientist from London Ontario Canada. He is most interested in the intersection between clinical practice and clinical learning, and he uses both qualitative research and quality improvement methods to understand and then enhance clinical care and clinical learning. In addition to his other leadership roles, he co-leads a multidisciplinary team of researchers focused on continuous quality improvement for the acute care medicine services at his hospital.