Harvard Affirmative Action Case: Skin Color or Character?

Подробнее о видео

For over four decades, affirmative action has been a hotly debated topic in the United States. In essence, affirmative action allows for the consideration of an applicant's race in university admissions, in an attempt to level the playing field in light of a history of systemic racial discrimination. However, this practice has faced legal challenges, with groups arguing that it is unfair and unconstitutional.

In this podcast, we sit down with Ryan Yonk, senior research faculty at AIER, to discuss the latest challenge to affirmative action. A group called "students for fair admissions" is taking on Harvard University, claiming that racial classifications and preferences in college admissions are unnecessary and unconstitutional.

We delve into the history of affirmative action and how it came to be, as well as the various arguments made for and against the practice. Ryan also provides insights on the Supreme Court's previous rulings on affirmative action, including the landmark case of Grutter v. Bollinger.

We explore the question of whether affirmative action truly achieves its intended goal of levelling the playing field, or if it perpetuates further discrimination. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of judging a person based on the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.

If you're interested in learning more about affirmative action and its current legal challenge, then tune in to this podcast. Don't forget to like and subscribe to our channel for more thought-provoking discussions on social and political issues. Leave your comments and questions below, as we love to hear from our viewers.

On this episode of Liberty Curious, Kate Wand was joined by Ryan Yonk.

Listen and subscribe 👇
Apple:
Spotify:
Audible:
Player FM:
YouTube:

More about AIER:
aier.org