No player’s even been so anti tennis

Подробнее о видео

Nick Kyrgios isn’t a failure—he’s just the anti-hero tennis didn’t know it needed.

Why People Call Him “Anti-Tennis”:

Kyrgios doesn’t fit the traditional mold. He openly admits he doesn’t train like other pros, clashes with umpires, mocks opponents, and says he sometimes doesn’t care if he wins or loses. He challenges the seriousness, etiquette, and rigid culture of tennis. He’s raw, real, and emotional—which some see as disrespect, but others see as authentic.

He’s “anti-tennis” only in the sense that he breaks the rules of how tennis players are supposed to behave. But on a pure talent level? He’s top-tier. Big serve, wicked hands, and unmatched flair—he’s beaten the best without a coach or a structured team.

Is He a Failure?

Not even close. Sure, he hasn’t won a Grand Slam (yet), and his ranking has never reflected his talent. But he reached a Wimbledon final, has wins over all the Big 3 in their primes, and helped change the sport’s culture—just by being himself.

You could argue he’s underachieved in terms of trophies, but he’s won over a generation that wants more realness in sports. And in his own words, tennis was never his everything. So maybe he didn’t “fail”—he just played a different game altogether. #kyrgios #federer #tennis