
Together, Frank and Jim answer questions like:
-- What's necessary to prove an event occured in the past?
-- Why weren't first-century historians bothered by textual differences found in the Gospels?
-- Why is it better to have four different gospel accounts vs. one harmonization?
-- Why would God allow these textual differences?
-- What surprised Jim the most the first time he read the Gospels as an atheist?
-- Why do detectives separate eyewitnesses?
-- When doing detective work, why does Jim prefer it when the stories are "messy"?
-- Does the evidence always determine the verdict? In other words, why do Jim and Bart come to different conclusions when it comes to the Resurrection of Jesus?
-- Why is bias against the supernatural a double-standard for materialist atheists?
-- What's the best way to test an eyewitness?
-- If the Gospels are contradictory and canโt be trusted, why do critics like Erhman conclude that much of the New Testament is true and that the disciples really believed they saw the resurrected Jesus?
-- How are atheists disagreeing with themselves and agreeing with Christians when it comes to alternative explanations for the resurrection?
And so much more! If you normally listen to podcasts on 2x speed you may need to slow it down for this one and take some notes!
๐ RESOURCES MENTIONED DURING THE EPISODE
Jim's website -
Cold Case Christianity -
Case Files: Murder & Meaning -
If you enjoyed this podcast episode PLEASE HELP US SPREAD THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY BY SUPPORTING OUR MINISTRY USING THE LINK BELOW. 100% of your donation goes to ministry, 0% to buildings!
๐ค ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฃ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ (๐ง๐๐ซ-๐๐๐๐จ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐) ๐ค
โ Website:
๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅ
โ Facebook:
โ X
โ Instagram:
โ TikTok:
๐๏ธ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๏ธ
โ Website:
โ Store:
โ Online Courses:
๐๏ธ ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ง๐ข ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ข๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๏ธ
โ Apple Podcast:
โ Spotify:
โ Pandora:
โ iHeart:
โ Podchaser:
#Podcast