
Science and the law come in to conflict more often than you might think. In this episode I want to tell you about several cases that I have followed which have concerned me greatly. The issue here isn't the actual scientific evidence, it is rather the way that scientists pursue and discuss this evidence, usually in a straight-forward and frank manner that doesn't sit well with courts.
Please feel free to support Data Colada's legal defense here:
This video comes with a quiz which you can take here:
Many thanks to Jordi Busqué for helping with this video
🤓 Check out our new quiz app ➜
💌 Support us on Donatebox ➜
📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜
👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜
📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜
👂 Audio only podcast ➜
🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
🖼️ On instagram ➜
00:00 Intro
00:32 Lie Detectors No Better than Chance
03:46 The Chiropractor Quacklash
05:38 For Better Science
09:02 Honesty Researcher Accused of Dishonesty
11:03 Cluster Cases
13:34 The Common Denominator
14:49 Browse Smarter with Opera
#science