Kings of backhand mastery

Подробнее о видео

Federer vs. Wawrinka: Who Has the Better Backhand?

Federer and Wawrinka both possess legendary one-handed backhands, but they are fundamentally different weapons. Federer’s is silky smooth and versatile, while Wawrinka’s is a raw power cannon. Let’s break it down:


1. Technique & Fluidity
• Federer: His backhand is one of the most beautiful shots in tennis—effortless, fluid, and precise. His grip allows him to hit a variety of spins and angles, making it a tool of finesse as much as power.
• Wawrinka: Stan’s backhand is textbook perfection—a high takeback, massive hip rotation, and full follow-through that generates brutal pace and topspin. His mechanics allow him to hit clean winners with ease.

Edge: Federer for fluidity, Wawrinka for textbook form.

2. Power & Spin
• Federer: While Fed can generate pace, his backhand is more about timing and precision. It’s at its best when he redirects pace rather than creating it.
• Wawrinka: Stan’s backhand is a pure power shot. He generates more topspin and depth naturally, which allows him to blow opponents off the court, even on slower surfaces like clay.

Edge: Wawrinka—his backhand is a true knockout punch.

3. Versatility & Variety
• Federer: His backhand is more adaptable, capable of absorbing pace, slicing, and attacking with different spins. He can use it defensively or offensively, making it a Swiss Army knife of a shot.
• Wawrinka: While he can change direction well, Wawrinka’s backhand is less varied—it’s primarily a heavy topspin weapon. His slice isn’t as effective as Federer’s.

Edge: Federer—his ability to mix it up gives him more options.

4. Defensive Stability
• Federer: His backhand has historically struggled against heavy topspin (e.g., Nadal’s forehand), but his slice and quick footwork allow him to stay in points.
• Wawrinka: His backhand holds up better under pressure, even against high-bouncing balls, because of his stronger base and natural topspin.

Edge: Wawrinka—his power lets him absorb pace better.

5. Effectiveness in Big Matches
• Federer: Early in his career, his backhand was a liability against Nadal, but he improved it over time, especially after 2017.
• Wawrinka: His backhand has carried him to three Grand Slam titles, often overpowering the best players in the world, including Federer himself.

Edge: Wawrinka—his backhand has been his signature weapon in big Slam wins.

Final Verdict
• Federer’s backhand is more versatile, stylish, and adaptable—perfect for all-court play.
• Wawrinka’s backhand is more powerful, stable, and devastating—a pure knockout weapon.

If we’re talking raw power and effectiveness, Wawrinka’s backhand is superior. But if we consider variety, elegance, and adaptability, Federer’s takes the edge.

Winner? It depends on what you value more—power (Wawrinka) or versatility (Federer). #tennis #federer #wawrinka #backhand #masters